Effects of OsomeFood Clean Label plant-based meals on the gut microbiomeOriginal paper
What was studied?
This intervention study tested how a short-term, plant-based meal program (the OsomeFood AWE diet) changed the human gut microbiome and self-reported wellbeing over three weeks. Participants ate the plant-based meals for weekday lunches and dinners across five consecutive days, then resumed their usual diet on weekends, for 21 days. Stool underwent shotgun sequencing analyzed with MetaPhlAn 3 and HUMAnN for species and functional pathways. Diversity, differential abundance, and correlations with wellbeing surveys were assessed.
Who was studied?
The cohort was ten healthy adult meat-eaters recruited in Singapore, split evenly by sex, aged 20 to 49 years, with most in their thirties. Inclusion required a BMI between 18 and 28; most participants (about 70 percent) fell in the overweight range. People on recent antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals, or long-term medications, and vegetarians, were excluded. Each person provided stool at day 1, day 7, and day 21, and rated satiety, energy, and perceived health at six timepoints during the study.
What were the most important findings?
Overall Shannon diversity stayed stable, but beta-diversity analysis showed species composition shifted significantly across timepoints (PERMANOVA p = 0.005). Differential abundance identified seven species changing between baseline and day 21, three elevated and four depleted. Broadly, 19 disease-associated bacteria (linked to cancer, inflammation, sepsis, and NAFLD) were suppressed while 30 health-associated species rose. Wellbeing scores for satiety, energy, and health all increased. Several gut species correlated positively with these wellbeing metrics, including Prevotella CAG 5226 with better perceived health.
What are the greatest implications of this study?
The findings suggest even a part-time, weekday plant-based diet can nudge the gut community toward a healthier profile and improve perceived wellbeing within three weeks. Overweight participants gained the most diversity and were the strongest responders, hinting the approach may be especially useful for weight management. Higher fiber intake was tied to fewer pathogenic species. The authors stress major limits: only ten participants, limited ethnic diversity, no full nutrient records, and no long-term follow-up. Benefits and their persistence need confirmation in larger controlled trials.